Galilee Diary #593, October 31, 2012
Marc Rosenstein
And the angel of the Lord said to [Hagar], "I will greatly increase
your offspring, and they shall be too many to count...Behold you are with
child and shall bear a son; you shall call him Ishmael, for the Lord has
paid heed to your suffering. He shall be a wild ass of a man; his hand
against everyone, and everyone's hand against him. He shall dwell
alongside all his kinsmen."
-Genesis 16:10-12
In discussions of the definitions of a Jewish state, one assumption
that is generally taken for granted is that a majority of the population
needs to be Jewish; and conversely, if the percentage of Jews falls
below 50%, the state will, sooner or later cease to be "Jewish," as the
majority will change the definition to something else. Of course, this
assumption leaves open a difficult question: who is a Jew for purposes
of calculating this percentage. In any case, assuming that a reasonable
consensus can be reached on this, a question I am asked frequently by
visiting groups, and that figures in various policy discussions and
political debates, is: What shall we do about the rapid growth of the
Arab population relative to that of the Jews? Are we not simply going
to be submerged by a sea of Arab babies while we hew to middle-class
standards of two kids and two cars?
From my observations and conversations with Arab teens and students
and educators in the Galilee, my answer to the question "What can we do
about the 'demographic threat?'" is simple: college scholarships. It is
clear that as the Arab population becomes more attuned to middle class
aspirations, their value system changes: If you are a farmer, having ten
children is useful. If you want your children to be doctors and
lawyers, having ten children is a big problem, even though Israeli
college tuition is only a small fraction of that in the US (about $3,000
per year [!]). All the young Arabs I know, who may have anywhere from
four to 16 siblings, are planning on families of 2-3 children. At this
point, the highest birth rate in Israel is among the Ultra-Orthodox.
The Christian Arab birth rate is below that of the Jews in general, and
the Muslim rate is falling toward the Jewish rate year by year, as the
population modernizes.
It therefore seems to me that wise policy would be to invest in the
educational and economic integration of the Arabs, not only for
demographic reasons, but for moral and economic and democratic ones.
However, Israeli Arab young people face several obstacles on the path to
such integration: a) In a number of popular fields, the Israeli
universities impose a minimum age requirement; since most Arabs don't do
army service, they are ready for college at 18, but have to mark time
until they are 21 to be accepted; b) because schools are partly funded
by local municipalities, and the Arab municipalities are at the bottom
of the socio-economic scale, the schools have fewer resources; and, in
addition, the psychometric exams are culturally biased, resulting in
generally lower scores for the Arabs. Thus, many Arabs find themselves
excluded from Israeli post-secondary educational options. Before the
fall of communism, many got scholarships to Eastern European
universities; since then, they have to pay their own way. Jordanian
universities are another option, relatively accessible, but very
expensive. King Abdullah distributes scholarships through various Arab
political parties in Israel, but these are relatively few. In a recent
conversation with an Arab high school principal, I learned of a new
option that has become popular: The universities in the West Bank, in
Jenin and Nablus. He did a little survey for me: Of 30 college-bound
kids who graduated this year and are already starting college this fall,
ten are at Israeli universities and colleges, nine in Europe, two in
Jordan, and nine in the West Bank.
Somehow, it seems to me not in Israel's interest to have its Arab
citizens getting their higher education in the Palestine Authority or
funded by scholarships granted by Arab nationalist parties.
Fear-mongering about the "demographic threat" may have its political and
fundraising uses, but doing something constructive about it would not
be all that difficult, and would make this a better place to live for
all of us.