Ethics Code Header

Ethics Code of the Union for Reform Judaism

Written April 13, 2017 by the Ethical Policies and Procedures Task Force of the Union for Reform Judaism, with portions adapted directly from the CCAR, ACC, and URJ employee ethics codes.

Adopted by the URJ North American Board of Trustees: 6/11/2017
Revised: 1/22/2018, 5/20/2018

If you have questions about the Ethics Code or reporting an ethics complaint, please contact the URJ Ethics Chair at ECChair@urj.org.

Introduction

At the Union for Reform Judaism (URJ), we hold ourselves to the highest standards of personal and professional integrity, moral conscience, and social responsibility.  The first section of this document gives voice to those standards.  The second section describes the structures and processes necessary to implement and enforce the Ethics Code with respect to volunteers and embed it into the culture of the URJ. 

The Ethics Code concerns volunteers, as well as interactions between volunteers and employees.  Employer/employee situations are governed by the URJ’s Employee Handbook as are disciplinary, supervisory and other matters.

In our work for the URJ, we pledge ourselves to be scrupulous in our adherence to this Ethics Code and to hold ourselves and our colleagues to the highest standards.  At the same time, we feel called to heal brokenness and to seek to balance midat hadin (principle of justice) and midat harachamim (principle of compassion) in all we do.

What follows is a living document, which regularly will be updated and revised in the light of experience, to guide our conduct in serving the URJ.
 

I. Ethical Standards

A. Personal Responsibility

We are obligated to conduct ourselves at all times according to the highest standards of moral behavior. This includes modeling Jewish values in our family, social and financial affairs. Whether in our work or personal lives, we must conduct ourselves with honesty and with respect for others.

  1. Family
    Our obligations to our families and our work for the URJ will, at times, inevitably conflict. We have an ethical responsibility to seek a balance between these competing demands.  We must endeavor to conduct our lives to maintain the integrity of our family relationships while at the same time fulfilling our responsibilities to each other and the URJ by completing the tasks we have undertaken for the URJ.
  2. Social
    Jewish values dictate our obligation to make moral decisions and act with integrity.  We must never engage in exploitative practices at the expense of others.  Any relationship that raises doubts as to its ethical propriety, or which a person feels compelled to keep clandestine, must give one serious pause and, at the very least, motivate the individual to seek moral counsel before proceeding.
    We expect ourselves and each other to be scrupulous in avoiding even the appearance of sexual misconduct, whether by taking advantage of others or by succumbing to the temptations of willing adults.  Similarly, recognizing the harmful consequences of addictive behaviors and substance abuse, we have a responsibility to seek help for any such needs or tendencies.
  3. Financial
    We must always act beyond reproach in conducting our financial affairs, both in our work and in our personal lives. (See Section I.C below.)
  4. Intellectual Honesty & Transparency
    It is never acceptable to take credit for work that is not one’s own, and proper recognition should be made to the party whose work product is used.  Plagiarism, copyright infringement or similar behavior is unethical and unacceptable.  Unless confidentiality dictates otherwise, decisions should be made with transparency, that is, characterized by openness, communication, and accountability.  Those making decisions must take responsibility for them. 

B. Stewardship of Relationships

1. Personal & Professional Relationships
Shared expectations of volunteers and employees working together at the URJ include:

  1. Treating one another as trusted colleagues, supporting one another in our work, and encouraging one another in our ideas.
  2. Conducting relationships in an open and honest way, and treating others with respect, dignity, and fairness in accordance with the Jewish value of g’milut chasadim.
  3. Creating an atmosphere that promotes open, courageous, and honest communication.
  4. Being clear about mutual expectations of one another when it comes to workload and addressing differences constructively.
  5. Striking a healthy balance in the facets of our work lives, our volunteer lives, and our personal lives to prevent our responsibilities in any of these domains from being compromised.
  6. Honoring the boundaries that each individual sets in their work and personal lives.

If in working with another person one feels that these expectations are not being met, the first step should usually be to speak directly with that person about the matter.  If this approach does not result in a satisfactory resolution of the problem, it should be brought to the attention of the appropriate supervisor, volunteer or professional, as the case may be.

URJ employees who feel that the unethical conduct of another is severe enough to constitute discriminatory harassment may report the matter to Human Resources or another appropriate person in accordance with the Employee Handbook without first speaking with the person engaged in the offending behavior.

2. Family Situations of Others
We have an ethical responsibility to protect others who appear to be victims of abuse or neglect.  It is up to each individual to determine whether or not to report such matters.  While reporting is typically not mandatory, other than situations involving abuse of a minor, anyone with a professional obligation to report circumstances of abuse or neglect should follow applicable professional guidelines.

3. Conflict of Interest
A conflict of interest occurs when one is in a position to influence decisions or outcomes on behalf of a party and such decisions or outcomes could directly or indirectly accrue personal benefit to oneself or one's family or friends.

A potential conflict of interest can be difficult to discern.  We have a responsibility to consult others about any real or potential conflicts and help one another resolve any such conflicts. 

Any real or potential conflicts of interest must be proactively and fully disclosed to the appropriate stakeholders.  An individual having a real or potential conflict of interest must not engage in the decision-making process or otherwise attempt to influence outcomes with respect to matters as to which there is a conflict unless and until:

  1. There has been full disclosure to the affected stakeholders;
  2. An approved mitigation plan is in place, and;
  3. The consent of the stakeholders to proceed is obtained, which, for matters of significance, should be in writing.

All URJ volunteers and employees must be familiar with and uphold the URJ’s Conflict of Interest Resolution and acceptance of gifts policies.

Members of the Oversight Committee are required to submit the annual certification form concerning Conflicts of Interest (attached as Attachment 1 to this document) to the Counsel of the URJ, who shall review all reportable relationships and report to the URJ Board Chair and President.

4. Inclusion / Discrimination
The Reform Movement has long advocated for equality and inclusion.  Our Jewish values speak to the idea that each of us, created in God’s image, b'tzelem Elohim, has a unique talent with which we can contribute to the high moral purpose of tikkun olam, the repair of our world.  Our obligation in our work for the URJ is to welcome all who desire to actively engage in the mission and goals of the URJ, and to assure that all who participate feel that their ideas and concerns can be openly stated and responded to with respect.  Excluding anyone from our community based on race, age, sex, religion, disability, marital or veteran status, nationality, sexual orientation, or gender identity diminishes us and compromises our ability to fulfill our mission.

Discrimination against others based on any of those factors, or other legally-protected classifications, is prohibited.  Discriminatory harassment and other offensive acts include any conduct, whether verbal, visual, or physical, which creates an abusive and hostile work environment, or which has the purpose or effect of interfering with an employee or volunteer’s work performance or development.

C. Financial Matters

Congregations, donors, and volunteers support the URJ because they trust its leaders to carry out their responsibilities in accordance with Jewish values, to be excellent stewards of resources, and to uphold rigorous moral and legal standards of conduct around financial matters.

1. Financial Conflicts of Interest
As discussed in Section I.B.3 above, all undisclosed conflicts of interest are prohibited.  With respect to financial matters, any behavior that calls into question one’s ability to act in the best interest of the URJ without regard to that person’s own independent financial or personal benefit, creates a potential conflict of interest that must be disclosed.  This disclosure requirement includes, for example, ownership in, investment in, or a compensation arrangement with any entity with which the URJ has or may have a transaction or business relationship. 

Accepting a bribe, a refund, a discount, or a payment in exchange for favorable action is prohibited.  This obligation includes, for example, refusing bribes or gifts that are rendered to curry favor.  In contrast, volunteers are not prohibited from accepting meals, out-of-town hospitality, or similar gifts from each other when motivated by team-building or friendship, provided that such gifts are not (i) excessive in value, (ii) otherwise illegal (iii) intended to seek favorable treatment or (iv) intended to induce or conceal illegal activity, breach of fiduciary duty or financial misconduct.

2. Resources and Records
Resources must not be misappropriated.  All URJ assets must be used only for disclosed, legitimate, and intended purposes of the URJ.

Individuals who prepare, maintain, review or have custody of URJ records and reports should ensure that such documents are accurate and complete; that they clearly reflect the assets and transactions of the URJ; that they are safeguarded from loss or destruction; and that they are maintained in confidence.

Financial matters should be conducted, and records maintained in compliance with national, state, provincial and local laws, rules and regulations.

D. Bullying & Sexual Boundaries

We are responsible for ensuring that personal and sexual boundaries are respected in our relationships with others. Bullying and sexual misconduct are both inconsistent with respecting the dignity of human beings.  URJ volunteers are obligated to refrain from all such behaviors when interacting with other URJ employees, volunteers or program participants in URJ-related activities.

1. Bullying
Bullying is unwanted, hostile behavior, either as a single act or repeated over time, with the intent to degrade, humiliate or oppress another person.  It can include: verbal behavior such as making threats, inappropriate sexual comments, and taunting; social misbehavior like spreading rumors and purposeful exclusion; physical behavior that involves hurting a person’s body or possessions; or cyberbullying such as persistent unwanted texts or phone calls or posting private and personal information to social media.  At the same time, honest criticism of one’s work and activities by a supervisor or colleague even if, sometimes, harsh is not bullying under this Ethics Code.  Bullying often involves a real or perceived power imbalance such as using physical strength, access to embarrassing information, a position in an organization, or popularity in order to control or harm others.

2. Sexual Harassment or Misconduct
Sexual harassment includes, for example, unwelcome sexual advances, unwelcome requests for sexual favors, and other unwelcome verbal, physical, or visual conduct of a sexual nature when:

  • Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual’s standing as a volunteer or employee.
  • Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as a basis for employment decisions affecting the individual or decisions concerning volunteer assignments, whether or not such decisions have direct economic consequences.
  • Such conduct has the purpose or effect, intentionally or unintentionally, of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work or volunteer performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.

The following categories of behavior are, by definition, unethical and never acceptable:

  1. Child sexual abuse, including any sexual activity, involvement or attempt of sexual contact by an adult, as defined by applicable law, with a person who is under the applicable legal age of consent.
  2. Sexual activity with a person who is legally incompetent or otherwise unable to give consent.
  3. Physical assaults or violence of a sexual nature, such as rape, sexual battery, or abuse, or any attempt to commit such acts.

E. Confidentiality & Privacy

Confidentiality involves the preservation of privileged information, especially as it pertains to personal or private information about an individual — including employees, volunteers, and donors — the URJ, a synagogue or other sacred community. 

Personal and financial information is confidential and should not be discussed publicly or disclosed to unauthorized individuals.  Care should be taken to ensure that unauthorized individuals do not overhear any discussion of confidential information and that documents containing confidential information are not left in areas accessible by unauthorized persons or inadvertently shared. 

On occasion, it may be appropriate and essential to break confidentiality so as to avoid physical or emotional harm to individuals at risk, particularly minors, or to report illegal behavior, such as fraud.  All such situations and decisions rest with the URJ Board Chair and President, who may discuss such matters with the Counsel and consult other members of the URJ’s senior leadership and outside professionals before deciding whether disclosure of the situation is necessary.

F. Internal & External Communication

URJ volunteers should demonstrate professionalism and good judgment when using any communication technology.  Care must be taken to protect confidentiality when required.  This is especially the case when using social media, including blogs, message boards, chat rooms, electronic newsletters, online forums, social networking sites, and other sites and services that permit users to share information with others.

1. Social Media
The URJ encourages its volunteers to make positive use of the internet and welcomes the dissemination of ideas that this mode of communication makes possible.  Sharing URJ-created content in a positive way advances our mission.  But we must avoid posting impulsively or without verifying information from third parties before posting it.  In addition, URJ volunteers must remain aware that what they post on social media may have an impact on the URJ’s reputation and must recognize the difference between a professional and a personal presence on social media.  Social media use should not interfere with one’s URJ responsibilities.

2. Email
In addition to following the above guidance concerning social media, all email communications must be handled carefully to avoid unauthorized or inadvertent disclosures of confidential information, for example, by leaving confidential information on computer screens.

Viewing or sending pornographic jokes or stories on URJ communications systems is forbidden.

3. Intellectual Property
Volunteers should recognize, respect and protect the intellectual property rights of the URJ and others.  This obligation includes obeying copyright laws governing how published materials are used and   distributed.

II. Implementation Structures and Processes

Effective implementation of the Ethics Code involves four related but distinct functions, all of which are within the province of a new URJ Ethics Council (EC), actively coordinating where appropriate with similar bodies established by the URJ’s partners and affiliates:

  1. Receiving, investigating, and adjudicating complaints concerning alleged violations of the Ethics Code brought against or by volunteers of the URJ.  In the event that a volunteer complaint involves a URJ employee, the complaint will be referred to the URJ HR Director.
  2. Gathering data concerning the Code’s implementation and actual experience with it.
  3. Periodically recommending revisions and additions to the Ethics Code reflecting the lessons derived from that experience.
  4. Providing training and ongoing education for volunteers, employees and stakeholders affected by the Ethics Code.

A. Adjudicating Ethical Violations

All URJ management, staff, North American Board (NAB) members, congregational presidents, and affiliate organization leadership will be informed of URJ ethics procedures and be instructed on how to handle inquiries about complaints and reporting obligations.

Persons receiving a complaint should respond compassionately but should not make judgments as to the existence or not of ethical misconduct.  They should inform the complainant about the procedure for making a complaint and may offer assistance in reporting the matter to the appropriate entity, if needed.

1. Role and Structure of the Ethics Council
The URJ EC is composed of a Chair and 4-6 URJ volunteers (a majority of whom must be NAB members) chosen by the URJ Board Chair.  In addition, the URJ Board Chair and the URJ Counsel, Associate Counsel and URJ HR Director serve as ex-officio members of the EC.  The EC is responsible for carrying out the four functions described above — investigating/adjudicating; data collection; recommending revisions to the Ethics Code; and providing training and education.  The EC may execute some of these responsibilities through subcommittees or task forces that include individuals, appointed by the URJ Board Chair, who are not members of the EC.  To ensure prompt and thorough responses to complaints, the EC shall develop a group of trained URJ volunteers and professionals to conduct investigations.  The EC Chair shall appoint select individuals, as needed, to investigate a complaint or, where warranted, select a team of individuals (usually not more than three) for that purpose.

2. Ethics Review Board
For purposes of reviewing EC decisions recommending the sanction of suspension for a stated period or removal from a URJ volunteer position, the URJ Board Officers shall be constituted as the Ethics Review Board (ERB).  In addition, the URJ Board Chair may name up two additional NAB members to serve on the ERB.

3. Filing a Complaint and Self-Reporting
Parties to the complaint include:

  • Complainant: the person filing the claim who may or may not be the person directly affected by the asserted unethical behavior.
  • Affected person: person or persons who have been adversely affected by the asserted unethical behavior.  In certain cases, such as alleged financial misconduct, the URJ or another entity, rather than an individual, may be the affected person.
  • Respondent: the person who is the subject of the complaint.

The URJ has an open-door policy for internal reporting.  A complaint may be filed by anyone having reason to believe that ethical misconduct has occurred, whether or not the complainant is the person affected by the conduct complained about.

For the EC to begin the investigative process, a complaint must be submitted to the EC Chair (ECChair@urj.org), and must include the names of all persons involved, as well as specific details of the alleged misconduct.  Complaints may be filed anonymously, but the EC will not open an investigation with respect to claims that lack sufficient specificity or verifiable information.

If the complainant has contacted the EC Chair, a member of the EC, or a URJ officer, but is not willing to initiate a written complaint or wishes to withhold relevant facts, the EC Chair may, with the consent of two EC members, independently initiate an investigation of the matter reported by preparing written documentation of the complaint signed by the EC Chair. 

Volunteers who, upon reflection, believe that they have engaged in unethical conduct are permitted and encouraged to report that fact, in confidence, to the EC Chair.  The self-reporting of unethical conduct will not preclude the EC Chair, with the consent of two EC members, from initiating an investigation, and making an adjudication, as warranted under the Ethics Code. 

There is no fixed limitation period barring the filing of a complaint with the URJ or preventing the EC from investigating alleged ethical misconduct.  However, the lapse of time since the alleged misconduct and the respondent’s conduct during the intervening period shall be among the factors considered in deciding whether to adjudicate the matter and in deciding upon the sanctions to be imposed if the investigation proceeds and unethical conduct is found to have occurred.

The URJ will comply with all applicable legal obligations regarding matters covered by this Ethics Code.  In addition, the URJ is committed to promptly investigating any reported ethical misconduct and requires all volunteers and employees to assist in such investigations.  If a volunteer or employee believes that the URJ is not responding within a reasonable period of time, the volunteer or employee may bring the concerns to the attention of the URJ Counsel.  In addition, the URJ has an obligation to report any suspected criminal activity to the proper authorities.

4. Confidentiality of Investigations

  1. Reports of ethical misconduct, complaints and investigations of complaints will be treated as strictly confidential.  No member of the EC or other person investigating a complaint shall disclose the existence of the complaint or the facts and circumstances relating to such matters until there has been a final adjudication, except as necessary to conduct a fair, adequate and timely investigation, or to prevent imminent and substantial harm to affected persons, the URJ or the community.
  2. No member of the EC or other person involved in conducting the investigation shall disseminate any information regarding a pending complaint to any source outside of the investigation, including the media, except in circumstances where notification is authorized by this document, or where disclosure is required by valid legal process, such as subpoena, and the Counsel has been consulted and afforded sufficient time to make a formal objection as warranted. 
  3. Nothing in this principle of confidentiality precludes the URJ Board Chair or the President from complying with legal requirements for reporting to appropriate authorities matters that are the subject of a complaint, as such legal requirements supersede the confidentiality provisions of this policy.
  4. To prevent damage to the URJ or its reputation, the Chair of the Special Nominating Committee and Chair of the Nominating Committee will confer with the EC Chair to ascertain that candidates for the URJ NAB or an officer position (a) are not the current subject of an ethics complaint or investigation, and (b) have not been sanctioned for a violation of the Ethics Code in the past.

5. Initial Notification Concerning the Complaint

  1. Response to complainant: The EC Chair shall promptly respond in writing to the complainant, acknowledging receipt of the complaint.  Either in the same communication or as soon as appropriate, the EC Chair will outline the process of investigation.
  2. Internal notification: The EC Chair shall promptly inform the URJ Board Chair and President when a complaint is filed against a volunteer.  If a complaint is filed against an employee, the EC Chair will refer the matter to the URJ Director of Human Resources.
  3. Notification to affiliates: If the respondent is a member of a Reform Movement professional or other affiliate organization, depending on the nature of the complaint and degree to which there is confirmation, the EC Chair, URJ Board Chair and President will coordinate with the other organization and, if necessary, determine which organization should continue with the investigation and adjudicatory process.
  4. Notice to persons in risk of harm: In cases in which imminent and substantial harm to the affected person, other individuals, the URJ or the community is likely to occur prior to a final adjudication and when the allegations of the complaint are sufficiently substantiated, the EC Chair, with the consent of two EC members, may give notice of such a preliminary assessment to the URJ Board Chair and President, who may take such action as they deem appropriate, such as informing others of the complaint or suspending the respondent’s participation in URJ activities pending a final EC determination.

6. Reporter Protection
There may be times when a volunteer or employee learns of a situation that appears to constitute unethical conduct under the Ethics Code.  The policy of the URJ is to encourage individuals to call to its attention instances of ethical misconduct by any of its employees or volunteers and, to that end, to protect from threats or retaliation any person who, in good faith, reports actual or perceived infractions of the Ethics Code.

Harassment or adverse actions affecting the employment or participation in URJ programs of any person who makes a good-faith report of unethical conduct under the Ethics Code is itself unethical conduct and, in the case of an employee, may result in discipline in accordance with the URJ Employee Handbook.

7. Investigation / Fact Gathering

  1. Establishment of Fact Gathering Team: The EC Chair will promptly establish a Fact Gathering Team comprised of impartial EC members and other relevant outside parties as needed.  The EC Chair will provide the Fact Gathering Team members with a copy of the complaint and the Fact Gathering Team will investigate the complaint.
  2. In order to determine whether there is a factual basis for the complaint, the Fact Gathering Team will meet with complainant and other parties as necessary (including legal counsel and witnesses).  At the appropriate time and as circumstances dictate, the Fact Gathering Team may meet with the respondent and, in its discretion, may give the respondent advance notice of the complaint and the provision(s) of the Ethics Code at issue.  In determining when notice should be given to the respondent, the Fact Gathering Team should consider whether there is a likelihood of adverse consequence to the complainant or affected person, continuing misappropriation of funds, or interference with the investigation.
  3. The Fact Gathering Team may not recommend a sanction without giving the respondent notice and an opportunity for response.
  4. Any person meeting with the Fact Gathering Team may be accompanied by up to two other persons.
  5. The complainant and respondent may file written documentation with the Fact Gathering Team to aid the investigation.
  6. The Fact Gathering Team will maintain careful documentation and records of all meetings and materials and log all telephone calls.
  7. Once initiated, the investigation and the adjudicatory process will proceed to resolution, irrespective of the respondent resigning from his/her position. A respondent who resigns from the URJ prior to, during, or after the adjudicatory process will be removed from his/her volunteer position and will be subject to the terms governing the sanction of removal noted below.
  8. The parties may agree to resolve the complaint without further action by the EC, provided that the EC is satisfied that the resolution is fair, ethical and not coerced.
  9. If the EC determines that no unethical conduct occurred, the case will be closed, and no further proceedings are necessary.
  10. If the complaint and response establish the occurrence of unethical conduct under the Ethics Code and no further investigation is required (for example, the respondent admits the allegations are true), the EC may proceed with adjudication.
  11. The EC Chair will give prompt notice of a voluntary resolution or determination of no misconduct to any person previously notified of the filing of the complaint.

8.  Post-Fact Gathering Procedure

  1. Recommendation by Fact Gathering Team - As soon as possible after conducting the investigation, the Fact Gathering Team will provide a written report of its findings and recommend to the EC Chair one of the following outcomes:
    1. A unanimous finding that there is not sufficient evidence to proceed to the adjudicatory process;
    2. A split finding, in which case the EC will determine whether to proceed to the adjudicatory process;
    3. A unanimous finding that there is sufficient evidence to proceed to the adjudicatory process.
  2. Process for reviewing the Fact Gathering Team’s report:
    1. A copy of the report will be sent to the EC.  Any member of the EC who is not impartial will recuse themselves from the case.
    2. The EC will review the report and may suggest changes or request additional information from the Fact Gathering Team before rendering a decision and distributing it to the parties involved.

B. Decision of the EC and Sanctions

The decision of the EC shall be in writing and clearly set forth the rationale upon which it is based including the applicable section(s) of the Ethics Code. The standard for decisions is preponderance of the evidence, i.e., more probably true than not. In each case the EC shall keep a record of all aspects of the case including correspondence, interview notes, statements and the like. The decision should also include the date of the vote, the vote count, and the members of the EC who participated in the vote. All decisions must be made with at least a quorum of the EC present and voting.

The following describes the possible outcomes of the adjudicatory process and the provisions for reinstatement after a suspension or removal.

1. Dismissal of the Complaint

  1. A decision dismissing the complaint is final and not reviewable unless the affected person(s) or complainant, within five (5) business days of the decision, petitions the EC for a rehearing to challenge the findings or recommendations.  The requesting party must provide a rationale for such a rehearing by, for example, citing significant evidence that was overlooked.  The EC has the discretionary authority to grant or deny the petition.
  2. If the complaint is dismissed the respondent may request that the dismissal be made public.  Absent such a request, the proceeding and its outcome will remain confidential.

2. Sanctions if a Violation is Found
Depending on the severity of the violation and other attendant circumstances, the EC may reprimand, censure or recommend to the ERB suspension or removal of a respondent from the respondent’s volunteer position within the URJ and/or from participation in URJ-sponsored activities. 

  1. Reprimand
    1. Reprimand is a form of admonishment communicated to the respondent regarding the respondent’s minor infraction of the Ethics Code.
    2. Reprimand requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of those EC members present and voting.
    3. A decision imposing reprimand is final and not reviewable unless any of the parties, within five (5) business days of the decision, petitions the EC for a rehearing to challenge the findings or recommendations. The requesting party must provide a rationale for such rehearing, for example, by citing significant evidence that was overlooked.  The EC has the discretionary authority to grant or deny the petition by majority vote.  The EC will communicate the decision to the respondent, the affected person(s) and, where the EC finds it would be appropriate, to the complainant.
    4. Notice of reprimand is not published.
    5. Notice of reprimand will be placed in the respondent’s file at the URJ.
    6. The EC will inform the URJ Board Chair and President when a volunteer has received a reprimand.A reprimand will be documented and entered into a central URJ database (Central Database), which will be maintained and visible only to the Director of the URJ Human Resources Department, the URJ Board Chair and President.Such notice shall include a reference to the provision(s) of the Ethics Code that has been violated.
    7. Any person making an appointment to a volunteer position or a Nominating Committee Chair is responsible for communicating with the Director of HR as part of the candidate vetting process.
    8. The URJ Board Chair and President may approve or require more extensive notification as they deem necessary in the public interest.
       
  2. Censure
    1. Censure is a form of sanction imposed for violations of the Ethics Code more serious than those giving rise to reprimand, but not sufficient to require suspension or removal.
    2. Censure requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of those EC members present and voting.
    3. An order of censure shall incorporate such conditions or restrictions, including provisions for monitoring compliance, as the EC may deem appropriate to protect those whom we serve and to prevent recurrence of the violation.
    4. If the respondent fails to fulfill the conditions imposed, the EC may, among other remedies, recommend to the ERB that the respondent be suspended or removed from all URJ functions.
    5. A decision of censure is final and not reviewable unless the affected person(s) or complainant, within five (5) business days of the decision, petitions the EC for a rehearing to challenge the findings or recommendations.  The requesting party must provide a rationale for such hearing, for example, by citing significant evidence that was overlooked.  The EC has the discretionary authority to grant or deny the petition by majority vote.
    6. Notice of censure will be placed in the respondent’s file at the URJ.
    7. The EC will inform the URJ Board Chair and President when a volunteer has been censured.A censure will be documented and entered into the Central Database, which will be maintained in visible only to the director of URJ Human Resources Department, the URJ Board Chair and URJ President.Such notice shall include a reference to the provision(s) of the Ethics Code that has been violated.
    8. Any person making an appointment to a volunteer position or a Nominating Committee Chair is responsible for communicating with the Director of HR as part of the candidate vetting process.
    9. The URJ Board Chair and President may approve or require more extensive notification as they deem necessary in the public interest.
       
  3. Suspension or Removal from URJ Position
    1. Depending on the severity of the violation and other attendant circumstances, the EC may recommend suspension for a stated time period or removal of the respondent from doing any volunteer work for the URJ and any other Reform Movement institutions.
    2. The sanction of suspension or removal is called for in cases involving the gravest offenses, repeated violations, failure to comply with conditions of censure, or willful failure to cooperate.  For example, in cases where:
      1. The respondent’s conduct causes significant harm to the affected person(s) or institutions involved, and/or
      2. The respondent fails to recognize the wrongfulness of what (s)he has done, and to take responsibility for those actions, and/or
      3. The respondent has been censured and refuses to fulfill the conditions of censure.
    3. An EC decision recommending suspension or removal requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of those EC members present and voting. 
    4. The respondent may, within five (5) business days of the decision recommending suspension or removal, (1) petition the EC for rehearing to challenge the findings or recommendations. The respondent must provide a rationale for such rehearing, for example, by citing significant evidence that was overlooked, which the respondent claims would compel dismissal of the complaint or imposition of a lesser sanction; (2) request immediate review by the ERB; or (3) waive the right to a rehearing or review. If the respondent waives the right to a rehearing or review, the EC recommendation is final.
    5.  Upon conclusion of either rehearing by the EC or request of the respondent for immediate ERB review, the decision and the record will be transmitted to the ERB promptly for its review. The ERB can accept the EC recommendation or, by the affirmative vote of at least 2/3 of its members present and voting, (1) dismiss the charge, (2) modify the sanctions imposed, or (3) direct the EC to permit the respondent to submit additional evidence. If the EC hears new evidence at the request of the ERB, its decision following that hearing will be final and not subject to further review.
    6. Notice of suspension or dismissal will be placed in the respondent’s file at the URJ.
    7. The EC will inform the URJ Board Chair and President when a volunteer has been suspended or removed.  The finding of suspension or removal will be documented and entered into the Central Database, which will be maintained and visible only to the Director of the URJ Human Resources Department, and the URJ Board Chair and President.  Such notice shall include a reference to the provision(s) of the Ethics Code that has been violated.
    8. Any person making an appointment to a volunteer position or a Nominating Committee    Chair is responsible for communicating with the Director of HR as part of the candidate vetting process.
    9. The URJ Board Chair and President may approve or require more extensive notification as they deem necessary in the public interest.
       
  4. Reinstatement
    1. An individual who has been suspended for a stated time period may apply to the EC, once the time has passed, for reinstatement based on a showing that the person has met all conditions imposed, for example, having acknowledged and repented for the misconduct, apologized to the victim(s), not resumed the misconduct, and established through the passage of time and the person’s behavior that the chance of a recurrence is highly unlikely. 
    2. An individual who has been removed may apply to the EC for reinstatement after the passage of at least three years based on the same showing that a suspended individual must make. 
    3. The EC shall conduct whatever investigation and gather whatever evidence it deems necessary to decide whether reinstatement is appropriate.  The EC decision on the application is made by the affirmative vote of at least 2/3 of its members present and voting and is subject to review by the ERB for a final decision.
    4. Notice of reinstatement will be documented and entered into the Central Database.  Upon request, the URJ Board Chair or President may advise the Chair of a Nominating Committee for the URJ or one of its affiliated organizations of the existence of the volunteer’s previous reprimand, censure, or suspension and subsequent reinstatement.  If the URJ made more extensive notification of such volunteer’s reprimand, censure, or suspension, the URJ will make a similar notification of such volunteer’s reinstatement.

C. Failure to cooperate

All parties are expected to cooperate with the EC throughout the process of investigation and adjudication.  Failure to cooperate may be taken into account in deciding whether and how to proceed and determining sanctions, if any.

If the respondent fails to cooperate with the EC due to a concurrent legal process, the EC may wait to adjudicate or impose sanctions until the legal process is completed.

If the respondent resigns from his/her URJ volunteer role during the process of fact gathering but prior to the adjudicatory process, the respondent will be regarded as removed and must apply for reinstatement to serve the URJ in accordance with paragraph II.B.2.d above.  Readmission must be conditional upon the resumption of the process of fact gathering and the adjudicatory process.

D. Unfounded Allegations

If the fact that a complaint for breach of the Ethics Code was filed has become public and, after fact gathering and decision by the EC, the complaint is considered to be without validity, the EC should remain mindful of the potential damage to the respondent’s reputation and position caused by the publication of an invalid complaint. If requested by respondent and deemed necessary by the EC in light of all the circumstances, the EC may take appropriate steps to help restore the respondent’s good name and stature.

If the Fact Gathering Team or EC finds that the complaint is mischievous, malicious, or vindictive, the EC shall lend moral and practical support to the respondent’s reasonable demands for apology from the complainant and vindication before the URJ.

 

Last edited June 5, 2018